I have been asked by a number of you to write a little more on the subject of Agile mindset and thinking, so here is the first in a series of articles that will target thinking and Agile mindset. In this article I will firstly identify what I refer to as 12 dysfunctional patterns of thinking. This is a two part article where I will cover the first 5 in this part and the remaining 7 in the next part.
So what are the 12 dysfunctional patterns of thinking?
My definition of an Agile mindset is one where learning and continuous improvement of ourselves is at the core of everything that we do. However we are often thwarted in our efforts to improve by our limitations in our thinking processes. The area of cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) identifies 12 different ways in which people’s thinking can often be distorted. In times of great stress people may adopt one or more of these ways of thinking and this can cause additional problems to the ones they are already experiencing. As a coach I encourage leaders and managers to first start to become aware of their own patterns of limiting thinking as these patterns will then become easier to spot in other people. A word of caution though: the purpose in spotting these thinking patterns is not so that you can set out to change or fix them in other people, this is an area best left to professionals who with the appropriate level of tact and skill can help people overcome these limitations.
So let’s start by giving you the list of the 12 dysfunctional patterns of thinking:
- All or nothing thinking
- Magnification or minimisation
- Emotional reasoning
- Discounting the positive
- Shoulds and musts
- Mental filter
All or nothing thinking
This was one of my favourite ways of distorting my own thinking. When under pressure I would often see things in very extreme ways, everything is either black or white with no shades of grey in between. The problem with this sort of thinking is that people may often fail to find solutions to their problems if they tend to focus on the extremes. Solving complex problems requires for us to have flexible thinking and the ability to not only identify with opposite ends of the spectrum but with the infinite possibilities that often lie between the extremes.
Magnification or minimisation
This type of thinking is where a person will amplify the “bad” or negative aspects of a situation while attenuating the positive. Of course some people might do the complete opposite. This way of thinking has the effect of distorting reality and may result in more stress for the thinker as they perceive some event or person as being more negative or positive than in reality.
Some people have a tendency to make external events or situations all about them. They may blame themselves or take on too much responsibility for the actions of other people or for circumstances that were outside of their control. An example of this would be where you may logically decide that the reason for the failure of the programme was because you failed to deliver your project within budget. Now it may be true that you may have had some part to play in that, but a blanket statement of “its all my fault” is rarely the truth.
Feelings are very powerful as anyone who has watched a rugby match can understand. The strength of our emotions can often muddy the water of our thinking processes. Coming to conclusions or reaching decisions as a result of our feelings may often lead to poor decision making especially in times of duress. To this end it is important to examine the evidence available in an unemotive way in order to come to an accurate assessment of the situation. It is worth mentioning that emotional reasoning is not the same as using our intuitive abilities, but that is a subject for another day.
Just as it says on the tin, this dysfunction is about believing we can read the minds of other people. We may tell ourselves things like “my colleagues think I’m an idiot”. Because we are thinking something we can have the tendency to believe that the other person is thinking the same thing. We need to check our assumptions and gather evidence before we start to act on our misplaced thinking, so in this example I can ask my colleagues if they do think I’m are an idiot and they may reassure me by telling me no, but do I believe them? If I don’t then I would contend that I have gone back to mind reading again.
In the next article I will provide a description of the other 7 dysfunctions of thinking. Here is a link to that article.